BeerDroid Weissbier vs Porter vs Lager
Three 10 L Batches, Three Fermentation Profiles

Same BeerDroid, same 10 L (2.6 gal) batch size—yet German Weissbier, Ruby Porter, and Thomas Coopers Artisan Reserve looked very different when I brewed them back to back, and the conditioned beers ended up in very different flavor directions too. This article lines up the fermentation behavior, completion time, and tasting notes from all three logs.

Ingredients for German Weissbier, Ruby Porter and Artisan Reserve Lager brewed as three 10 L BeerDroid batches
Three consecutive 10 L BeerDroid batches. This comparison covers fermentation behavior and conditioned tasting notes, without ranking the beers.

The short version: elapsed days were only part of the story

ItemGerman WeissbierRuby PorterArtisan Reserve Lager
Batch size10 L (2.6 gal)10 L (2.6 gal)10 L (2.6 gal)
Propagate21°C (70°F)19°C (66°F)22°C (72°F), first 12 h
Main Ferment targetStarted at 17°C, then changed to 19°C (63→66°F)16°C (61°F)12°C (54°F)
Early visual behaviorFine bubbles were obvious on days 1–2Vent overflow at about 34 hReached the 12°C range at about 37 h; visually calmer
Late stageVery quiet by days 4–5 but still in FermentQuieter at 4 d 19 h → Cleanup at about 5 d 1 hQuieter at 4 d 13 h → Cleanup around day 5
EOF / Ready to Keg~6 days~8 days8 days 4 h
Conditioned tastingRicher body, stronger banana aroma; carbonation slightly weakCoffee/cacao-like bitterness with rich chocolate-like body and sweetnessBright green-apple-like character, low bitterness, clean and crisp

Gear and supplies used in this comparison

BrewArt BeerDroid
The same 10 L (2.6 gal) automated brewer was used for all three batches. It manages the Propagate, Ferment, Keg, and Store temperature stages and reports status through the BrewArt app.

View the BrewArt BeerDroid on the official site →

German Weissbier BrewPrint
The BeerDroid ingredient pack used for the Weissbier batch. Ferment started at 17°C (63°F) and was later changed to 19°C (66°F).

View the German Weissbier BrewPrint on the official site →

Ruby Porter BrewPrint
The ingredient pack used for the Porter batch. Its standout behavior was vent overflow at about 34 hours while Ferment centered on 16°C (61°F).

View the Ruby Porter BrewPrint on the official site →

Thomas Coopers Artisan Reserve BrewPrint
The ingredient pack used for the lager batch. The program moved from a 22°C (72°F) Propagate stage to 12°C (54°F) Ferment, then stepped up to 15°C and 17°C (59°F and 63°F) late in the run.

View Thomas Coopers Artisan Reserve on the official site →

BrewArt 5 L Kegs
Each 10 L batch was split between two 5 L (1.3 gal) PET kegs for secondary fermentation and conditioning.

View BrewArt 5 L Kegs on the official site →

Five Star Star San Sanitizer
A common consumable across these batches for sanitizing beer-contact kegging parts such as kegs, caps, and spears.

View Star San on Amazon →

Main takeaway

The Porter and lager finished on almost the same calendar, but they did not follow the same fermentation path. The Porter centered on a 16°C (61°F) Ferment stage; the lager moved through 22→12→15→17°C (72→54→59→63°F). Looking at the window, temperature path, and BeerDroid phase together told a much richer story than elapsed days alone.

This is a real-world comparison of one batch of each style, not a controlled experiment. The recipes, yeasts, and programs were different. The tastings were not simultaneous or blind and the conditioning conditions were not perfectly matched, so the flavor section compares recorded batch impressions rather than ranking the beers.

Same BeerDroid, very different starts

Weissbier: fine bubbles were easy to see on days one and two

The German Weissbier used here is my second batch. Propagate ran at 21°C (70°F). Ferment began at 17°C (63°F), and I later changed the target to 19°C (66°F). On days one and two, fine bubbles were continuously visible through the front window, making this the easiest of the three batches to visually identify as “active.”[1]

Weissbier, Day 1. Fine bubbles are easy to see through the window.
BeerDroid temperature graph for German Weissbier on Day 1
Day 1. The app showed 20.0°C against a 19°C target, with temperature rising again after cooling.

Porter: vent overflow at about 34 hours

Ruby Porter used a 19°C (66°F) Propagate stage and a 16°C (61°F) Ferment target. At roughly 34 hours, foam pushed out through the top vent and ran down the side of the BeerDroid. The app was still near the 16°C target. BrewArt also notes that vigorous fermentation may overflow through the vent during the first 48 hours.[2]

Ruby Porter foam overflowing from the top vent of the BeerDroid
About 34 hours after start: foam built up around the vent.
BeerDroid temperature screen during the Ruby Porter overflow
The batch was still near its 16°C target during the overflow.

Lager: part of the process was simply getting down to 12°C

Thomas Coopers Artisan Reserve uses a lager program: the first 12 hours are Propagate at 22°C (72°F), followed by Ferment at 12°C (54°F).[3][4] From my brew-start temperature, it took about 37 hours to settle into the 12°C range. In other words, it was not sitting at 12°C from the moment I pressed Start.

Artisan Reserve BeerDroid temperature profile showing the drop from 22°C to 12°C and late ramp to 15°C and 17°C
Temperature checkpoints from the actual batch. The low-temperature descent itself was a major difference from the ale-style runs.

Fewer bubbles did not mean “finished”

The most useful lesson from these three consecutive batches was that the sight window made more sense when I looked at it together with the BeerDroid temperature graph and brewing phase.

The BeerDroid cools the batch to hold its target. After cooling stops, ambient heat can raise the measured temperature again, so I cannot treat a post-cooling rise as a direct measurement of fermentation heat. The app temperature is also not gravity data and does not directly measure fermentation rate.

How I read these logs
I compared three things together: (1) bubbles and liquid movement in the window, (2) how temperature recovered after cooling, and (3) the BeerDroid phase—Ferment, Cleanup, or Keg. The rebound is only a qualitative clue, not a gravity substitute.

Weissbier: Day 1 versus Day 5

On Day 1, fine bubbles were active and the graph showed temperature climbing again after cooling. By Day 5, visible movement was much quieter, the batch was at 19.0°C against a 19°C target, and the graph was flatter than it had been early in fermentation. Yet the BeerDroid was still in Ferment and EOF had not arrived.

Weissbier, Day 5. The window looks much quieter, but EOF had not arrived.
BeerDroid temperature graph for German Weissbier on Day 5
Day 5: 19.0°C / Target 19°C, with a flatter graph than the early stage.

Porter: still active after the overflow, then quieter by days four to five

At about 2 days 11 hours, the external overflow had stopped, but fine internal movement was still visible. At about 4 days 19 hours, both the visible motion and the temperature rebound looked gentler. Roughly six hours later—about 5 days 1 hour—the BeerDroid entered Yeast Cleanup and raised the target from 16°C to 17°C (61→63°F).

Porter at about 2 d 11 h. Fine movement remains after the overflow.
Ruby Porter BeerDroid temperature graph at about 2 days 11 hours
At the same checkpoint, the temperature rebound after cooling was still fairly clear.
Porter at about 4 d 19 h. The window is noticeably calmer.
Ruby Porter BeerDroid temperature graph at about 4 days 19 hours
Still in Ferment, but the late-stage pattern looks gentler than earlier.

From Cleanup onward, part of the temperature rise is programmed. That is different from the natural rebound after a cooling cycle during the main Ferment stage and should not be read as evidence that fermentation suddenly became stronger.

Lager: quieter by day four, then a programmed 12→15→17°C finish

At about 2 days 12 hours, the lager was at its 12°C target and the temperature rebound after cooling was still relatively clear. Fine suspended material and internal movement remained visible. At 4 days 13 hours, both the rebound and the window activity looked gentler. Around Day 5, Yeast Cleanup began and the target moved from 12°C to 15°C (54→59°F), then to 17°C (63°F).

Lager at about 2 d 12 h. Fine internal movement remains at the low-temperature stage.
Artisan Reserve BeerDroid temperature graph at about 2 days 12 hours
12°C target, with a fairly clear rebound after cooling.
Lager at about 4 d 13 h. The window is much quieter.
Artisan Reserve BeerDroid temperature graph at about 4 days 13 hours
The rebound appears gentler than on days two and three.

The later 12→15→17°C rise is the BeerDroid program itself. Once the setpoint is moving, the upward temperature slope cannot be used as a fermentation-heat comparison.

The surprising number: ~6 days, ~8 days, 8 days 4 hours

My observed EOF / Ready-to-Keg times were about 6 days for the Weissbier, about 8 days for the Porter, and 8 days 4 hours for the Artisan Reserve lager.

Ready to Keg and EOF comparison: German Weissbier about 6 days, Ruby Porter about 8 days, Artisan Reserve Lager 8 days 4 hours
The lager finishing on almost the same calendar as the Porter was the biggest surprise.

BrewArt lists a 9–20 day brewing estimate for Thomas Coopers Artisan Reserve.[3] I had planned around the possibility that the lager would occupy the BeerDroid for close to three weeks. Instead, this batch reached Ready to Keg at 8 days 4 hours.

Artisan Reserve official 9 to 20 day estimate compared with an observed Ready to Keg time of 8 days 4 hours
Official estimate versus this batch. The chart does not include post-keg secondary fermentation or conditioning.

Similar day counts, very different temperature paths

German Weissbier21°C Propagate → Ferment began at 17°C → manually changed to 19°C (70→63→66°F).
Ruby Porter19°C Propagate → 16°C Ferment → 17°C Cleanup → 18°C Keg (66→61→63→64°F).
Artisan Reserve Lager22°C Propagate (12 h) → 12°C Ferment → 15°C → 17°C → 18°C Keg (72→54→59→63→64°F).
What I comparedNot just elapsed days, but temperature path + sight window + BeerDroid phase.

The Porter and lager both finished around day eight, but the environment the BeerDroid created during those eight days was very different. That became the main takeaway from this comparison: the route to the finish line was more informative than the finish date by itself.

Once conditioned, the three glasses diverged even more

Now that all three individual batch logs include conditioned tasting notes, I can compare the finished beers as well as the fermentation behavior. This was not a simultaneous blind tasting, and the conditioning conditions were not perfectly matched, so this is not a ranking. It is a side-by-side comparison of the tasting notes recorded for each batch.

German Weissbier

Conditioned German Weissbier from the batch that started Ferment at 17°C and was later raised to 19°C

Compared with my earlier 17°C / 63°F batch, the 17→19°C / 63→66°F batch tasted richer, with a stronger classic banana aroma. Carbonation was still slightly weak.

Ruby Porter

Ruby Porter after at least 14 days of secondary fermentation and conditioning

The standout notes were coffee- and cacao-like bitterness plus rich, chocolate-like body and sweetness. It was a completely different direction from the Weissbier.

Artisan Reserve Lager

Conditioned Artisan Reserve Lager poured from the keg

The lager showed a bright, green-apple-like character, low bitterness, a clean palate, and a crisp finish. It felt light and was very easy to keep drinking.

AttributeGerman WeissbierRuby PorterArtisan Reserve Lager
Main flavor impressionStronger banana aromaCoffee/cacao-like bitterness with chocolate-like richnessBright green-apple-like fruitiness
Body / palateRicher than the earlier 17°C batchRich body and sweetnessClean, with very little heaviness
BitternessNot a primary tasting metric in the individual logNoticeable coffee/cacao-like bitternessLow
Finish / carbonationCarbonation slightly weakNot a primary tasting metric in the individual logCrisp and refreshing
The finished beers separated just as clearly as the fermentation logs

The Weissbier leaned toward banana and richer body, the Porter toward roasted-style bitterness and chocolate-like richness, and the lager toward green-apple brightness and a clean, crisp finish. These are the recorded impressions from the three batches; this comparison does not isolate temperature profile as the cause of those flavor differences.

What this comparison can—and cannot—show

These batches shared the same BeerDroid and 10 L batch size, but this was not a controlled experiment.

What these runs show

The early visual behavior differed dramatically. Visible motion and post-cooling rebound generally became gentler late in the run. The Porter and lager finished on similar calendars while following very different temperature profiles.

What they do not prove

I cannot generalize that every Weissbier takes six days or every lager takes eight. The recipe, yeast, and program differed, and the Weissbier target was manually changed mid-Ferment.

What I want to add next

Gravity data. A RAPT Pill or another SG logger would let me line up window movement, temperature, and specific gravity on the same timeline.

The three full batch logs

German Weissbier

Ferment began at 17°C and was later changed to 19°C. The full log includes days 1–5, EOF at about six days, kegging, conditioning, and a later tasting comparison against my earlier 17°C batch.

Read the German Weissbier log →

Ruby Porter

A 16°C fermentation with vent overflow at about 34 hours, window and temperature checkpoints through day four, Cleanup at about 5 days 1 hour, EOF at around eight days, and the later conditioned tasting.

Read the Ruby Porter log →

Artisan Reserve Lager

A 22°C Propagate stage followed by 12°C Ferment, about 37 hours to reach the 12°C range, Cleanup around day five, a 15→17°C late ramp, Ready to Keg at 8 days 4 hours, and the later clean, green-apple-like conditioned tasting.

Read the Artisan Reserve log →

Conclusion: nearly the same number of days, very different fermentation stories

Three batches, one BeerDroid, 10 L each. The headline numbers were about six days for the Weissbier, about eight days for the Porter, and 8 days 4 hours for the lager. The obvious surprise was that the lager did not take dramatically longer.

The more interesting part was everything between start and finish. The Weissbier showed easy-to-see fine bubbling. The Porter fermented hard enough to overflow the vent. The lager had to cool into a true low-temperature stage and later stepped through 12→15→17°C before Keg.

Across these three runs, the late-stage window activity and post-cooling temperature rebound generally became gentler. Looking at the window, temperature graph, and BeerDroid phase together was more informative than relying on bubbles or the day counter alone.

The conditioned glasses separated just as clearly: banana aroma and richer body in the Weissbier, coffee/cacao-like bitterness and chocolate-like richness in the Porter, and bright green-apple character with a clean, crisp finish in the lager. Keeping both fermentation logs and tasting notes made the recipe-to-recipe differences much easier to see.

Research. Brew. Watch. Compare. Learn.

References

  1. BrewArt, German Weissbier. BrewPrint product information. BrewArt
  2. BrewArt, Ruby Porter. Product information, fermentation timing, and first-48-hour overflow note. BrewArt
  3. BrewArt, Thomas Coopers Artisan Reserve. Lager program and 9–20 day brewing estimate. BrewArt
  4. BrewArt, BeerDroid Instruction Manual. Lager Propagate 22°C, Ferment 12°C, Keg 18°C and BeerDroid phase information. PDF

The timings, temperatures, and visual observations above are from these specific batches. The BeerDroid temperature graph is not a hydrometer and does not directly measure fermentation rate.

Questions or comments about this article?

If you want to compare BeerDroid fermentation behavior, temperature graphs, or the three batches, feel free to send a note.

Your email address is used only for replies and is not published on the site.

I posted this three-batch comparison on X first

The website pulls the three individual brew logs together; X keeps the comparison process and shorter observations as they happened.

Follow Cony DIY Houston on X →

← Back to Homebrewing